Kagan is judging a law that she advocated for. What a friggin joke
________________________________ From: Jerry Foote <[email protected]> To: 'ProFox Email List' <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 2:33 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Obama says Supreme Court unelected How could anyone judge that Elena Kagan was a non political objective individual. Perhaps new justices be selected by a bipartisan committee submitting lists of sitting judges whose prior ruling could reviewed for objectivity. This should not be a political position. Jerry -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:10 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Obama says Supreme Court unelected On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jerry Foote <[email protected]> wrote: > The appointments to the supreme's should be from a pool of truly objective > judges. ------------------------------ Until I object with your "objectiveness" -- Stephen Russel[excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
