On 8/7/06, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, I understand the support thing - I support lots of shareware
stuff that I could be using for free, because I feel that if created
that tool/app, I'd like those who use it to pay me, too.
Yep. I inventoried my WinXP box and was amazed at how much paid
software - at $29 and $39 and $49 - I had on there.
But you didn't mention the technical part of the decision. What
reasons pro/con would you list for CentOS? I ask because I'm thinking
of upgrading my server soon, and this is one candidate.
One of our development boxes is CentOS and I couldn't be more pleased
with it. Rock solid. And I'm willing to pick up support for it myself
when RH want $400 a year or so for support. So, CentOS, SuSE and
possibly Ubuntu are fine from a technical perspective. It was Fedora I
eliminated, along with thousands of other distros, because of the
long-term stability issues.
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
