On 19.08.22 10:47, Sam R wrote:
So I am a little divided,
On the one hand I think that port 25 is enough to transmit mails locally,
I guess by "locally" you mean "on the local network".
port 25 is standard for server-server communication, 465/587 are standard
for client-server communication where authentication is required/enforced.
on the other hand I think that an encryption would be better, especially on
the dmz.
On 8/19/22 07:08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I'd say "especially for connections crossing not-secured network".
mails within LAN/DMZ should be safe unencrypted, unless you have reason not
to trust the network or someone on it.
On 19.08.22 09:09, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Google made this assumption and it turned out to be wrong. Use mutually
authenticated TLS.
what are you talking about?
because I have access to private networks where this is not an issue.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
- Holmes, what kind of school did you study to be a detective?
- Elementary, Watkins. -- Daffy Duck & Porky Pig
