On 8/18/22 06:14, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 18.08.2022 o godz. 09:17:39 Sam R pisze:
>> As you suggest, I enabled TLS wrappermode on both senders servers and the
>> internal server, set  "smtp_tls_security_level =  encrypt " to senders
>> servers and it seems perfect now.
>> Thanks a lot Noel and Thank you all too!
> 
> I doubt if you should use port 465 at all.
> 
> RFCs clearly say that port 465 is for mail submission, not for receiving
> mail addressed to local users, and that authentication is mandatory on port
> 465. From what you write, it seems that you send mail via port 465 without
> authentication, which is not the intended use of that port.
> 
> IMHO, you should be sending mail between your servers using just regular
> port 25. The servers should have each other IP addresses in $mynetworks, so
> the receiving server will trust the sending server.

I recommend using client certificate authentication on port 465 instead.
IP addresses are not a strong form of authentication unless one is using
a secure VPN such as WireGuard.  Also one should be encrypting traffic
anyway as a matter of best practice.
-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to