"r" == raf <post...@raf.org> writes:
r> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:06:29AM -0500, post...@ptld.com wrote:
Spamhaus is just one company you can use, there are several others, I am
not making any claims or recommendations to them over any other. They do
allow free usage for low volume servers which is why i use them.
r> Just a data point. When I added RBL checking, I used four different
r> services:
r> zen.spamhaus.org dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net bl.spamcop.net dnsbl.sorbs.net
r> I found that the last three blocked too much solicited commercial email. I
r> only continued to use spamhaus (even though it has bad policies relating to
r> IPv6 - grr).
On 22.12.21 04:45, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
uceprotect and sorbs are IMO are to be avoided.
they are safe if you use scoring, on postscreen level for example.
I have found the following
to be reasonable:
mailspike.net
mail.XX.bl.blocklists.de XX stands for the mirror used is US/UK/DE etc.
spamrats.com
hostkarma.junkemail.com
spamrats.com
funny, some time ago I found spamrats very unrealiable, junkemailfilter
realiability is imho on level of sorbs/uceprotect (scoring only)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so I bought a Macintosh".
