> On Feb 3, 2021, at 2:34 PM, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: > >> However, in my role as an admin, you just gave me excellent >> justification to never run Postfix. > > If you think that is a reason to not run Postfix then you can't run SMTP at > all. > > You do not get to redefine standards just on your whim.
There's no need to punch a man when's down. While I'll defend carefully made decisions in Postfix, I don't think that a broad hostility to the OP is justified. Sure, one message was needlessly snarky, and I disagree with some others on technical grounds. But he's backed off (be it somewhat miffed) and should not be further harangued. It'd be a shame if he avoids Postfix, especially if he stays with Sendmail, which Postfix bests in a multitude of ways. We do expect the discussion on this list to not veer into hostility, even more so from those who've been here a while... Perhaps I should have made clear earlier that the information shared by the OP, that was a recent discovery for him, was already well known to Postfix developers for around a decade, and we've made considered choices in that space. -- Viktor.