> A more targeted approach is to use smtp_delivery_status_filter with
> a regexp that targets that exact error message, and that changes a
> 'hard' reject into a soft one.

> For inspiration to turn hard into soft rejects, see examples at
> http://www.postfixlorg/postconf.5.html#default_delivery_status_filter

Thank you for your feedback on this Weitse.  I have read all the links
you provided.  There is a great deal of finger pointing at AT & T.
The general theme is some of the AT & T servers are more picky about
rDNS and the like.

I was not able to get the "inspiration" link above to work for some
reason.  I scanned "man postconf 5" but was not able to find relative
examples.

I would like to have some feedback on design and best practice if
possible.  We have a randmap set of four ips that are sending email
from @devotion.raystedman.org.  Should the rDNS associated with these
ips point to raystedman.org or devotion.raystedman.org?  I am not
familiar enough with the RFCs to research this.  Would it be a
positive change to move rDNS/master.cf from raystedman.org to
devotion.raystedman.org in this scenario?

Thanks again, Greg
www.RayStedman.org

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 9:49 AM Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
>
> Wietse Venema:
> > The exact message, incluing the name 'alph765' of the cluster with
> > broken reverse DNS:
> > https://forums.att.com/conversations/att-internet-email-security/prodigynet-reverse-dns-lookup-is-broken/5f07b53ac17a063d9bfecdb8
> >
> > It affects multiple domains hosted at AT&T:
> > https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2093608-reverse-dns-record-for-email-rejected-by-sbcglobal
> > https://www.netsolinc.com/prodigy-email-issues/
> >
> > This is what I did when GMAIL was randomly bouncing mail because
> > of some bogus DNS error:
> >
> > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> >     transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
> > [... details omitted...]
>
> That was years ago.
>
> A more targeted approach is to use smtp_delivery_status_filter with
> a regexp that targets that exact error message, and that changes a
> 'hard' reject into a soft one.
>
> For inspiration to turn hard into soft rejects, see examples at
> http://www.postfixlorg/postconf.5.html#default_delivery_status_filter
>
>         Wietse

Reply via email to