PGNet Dev:
> Two questions:
>
> (1) my postfix config includes,
>
> strict_rfc821_envelopes = yes
>
> the FROM: & RCPT TO: addressed i inject, as well as those in the originally
> sent mail, appear to be compliant.
>
> is there _more_ that strict restriction that might be relevant?
Postfix would have logged any hostile actions..
> (2) currently, the opendmarc milter here is launched as a 'simple'
> non-forking/foreground systemd service
I don't expect that the forking model would make a difference
for how DMARC etc. policy is evaluated.
> Initially, I see no difference. At least not with the XCLIENT
> injection tests.
>
> For milter use, in postfix, is there any preference/requirement
> for the milters to exec in forked vs. un-forked mode?
Postfix does not care. If forked versus non-forked would change the
bits that the milter receives or sends, then that would be a defect
on the milter side (it can happen when they fork in the middle of
a postfix-milter conversation that is already in progress, but the
cole is old enough that it would be unlikely).
Wietse
