Demi M. Obenour:

Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On 10/5/20 6:15 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Demi M. Obenour:
> >> There was a recent vulnerability in OpenBSD due to libc malfunctioning
> >> in a set-uid-root program under very low resource limits.  I would
> >> prefer to minimize the amount of third-party libraries that are used
> >> by postdrop.  That said, another option would be to error out if the
> >> resource limits are below what we consider a reasonable minimum.
> > 
> > Another good reason for not using set-uid root programs...
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> > I don't think it is practical for Postfix to have universal minimal
> > resource limts. You can add some custom OPENBSD code later.
> 
> That makes sense.  The OpenBSD vulnerability has been fixed, and was
> merely used as an example.  No OpenBSD-specific code will be needed,
> at least not for this purpose.
> 
> > Surprise: Postfix has a strip_addr() function that can remove adress
> > extensions before enforcing the ACL.
> 
> Good to know! That proved critical.
> 
> >> Is the code in smtpd_check.c a good place to start?
> > 
> > Yes. It also helps you to become familiar with Postfix's
> > approach to parsing.
> 
> Indeed it was helpful. Thanks for the tip!
> 
> Patch (made against 3.5.7) attached.  I lightly tested it locally and
> it seems to work, but there could very well be bugs.  I am virtually
> certain that I violated the Postfix coding style somewhere, sorry.
> I can also send the patch inline if you prefer.

I can read it. I'll try to massage the code later this week (instead
of a dozen back-and-forth email messages about awkward details).

mail_addr_find -> maps_find
"+" -> var_rcpt_delim
allow 'not found' users, similar to smtpd_sender_login_maps
put the new code inside its own function, avoiding gotos

        Wietse

> For what it is worth, I found the Postfix source code to be very clean
> and easy to read.  Writing this patch probably took about four hours
> of work, which is significantly less than I expected for a non-trivial
> feature.  Thank you for all the work you have put into Postfix!
> 
> >     Wietse
> Thank you,
> 
> Demi

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

[ Attachment, skipping... ]
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

Reply via email to