Hey Ansgar,
thank you for your quick reply. For sure the quasi-static tables should be managed via deploymant-systems or simplier rsync and that alike. We distribute the more dynamic tables - e.g. cidr-tables with self-harvested current spammer's IPs - actually by simply distributing those files with rsync. I hesitate to use distributed filesystems, because the multiple r/w-access results in big overhead/load. Also the 'permanent' inbound MTA-avaibility goes miles before applying rules/filtering. I searching for pros/cons for: 1. distributing new entries to all servers with special program/interfaces to named pipes or memcache 2. DRBD or GlusterFS 3. REDIS - which allows triggers Maybe Wietse has a redis-table-module in his drawer? ;-) Kris -- Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html
