On 4/19/19 12:00 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Scott Kitterman skrev den 2019-04-19 17:48: > >> I'd suggest reading RFC 6376, Section 5.4 (Determine the Header >> Fields to >> Sign) [1] directly. I think it's advice holds up reasonably well. > > thanks for link, its just that mailman breaks that rfc then, if > changing reply-to > Or that RFC break Mailman, and many other long established methods of operation for mailing list.
>From what I have seen from DKIM is that domains that implement it really should be required to tell their users that they should not be using any remailing service (like most mailing list) that don't adhere to some new DKIM rules, needed to avoid breaking the DKIM signature, even though following these rules will break some traditionally provided features, and may even force the list to break some laws (laws on mass mailings that REQUIRE instructions on how to unsubscribe be included in the message) -- Richard Damon
