Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> writes:
> On Saturday, April 06, 2019 04:55:58 PM Laura Smith wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am currently refreshing my perimeter mail infrastructure.
>>
>> The current state of affairs of DKIM signing looks pretty miserable!
>>
>> DKIMProxy seems to be abandonware since 2010
>>
>> OpenDKIM seems to be going the way of abandonware too (last release in 2015
>> and the bug tracker filling up).
>>
>> I've had a quick search on github for DKIM but can't find much of interest.
>>
>> We all know what software is like, you have to keep it fed and watered
>> otherwise it starts growing bugs (or worse). I'm not too keen on using
>> software of 2015 vintage.
>>
>> What is everybody using these days ? Or have I missed something in the
>> world of email and everyone's moved from DKIM to the Next Best Thing (TM).
>>
>> Looking forward to your suggestions
>
> I've written https://launchpad.net/dkimpy-milter
>
> It is not yet particularly suitable for complex, multi-domain setups, but for
> smaller users works well (I use it - this message will be signed by it).
> Unlike any other released postfix option (the OpenDKIM beta has limited
> support) it supports both RSA and Ed25519 signing/verifying. It's
> configuration syntax is almost entirely compatible with OpenDKIM's (It
> supports a subset of OpenDKIM's options and has a few of it's own added to
> support Ed25519).
I've been eyeing dkimpy-milter as something I'd like to switch to at
some point, but I need the multi-domain bits that opendkim has. So
definitely looking forward to advancements on dkimpy!
--
micah
