On Saturday, April 06, 2019 06:32:18 PM André Rodier wrote: > On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 16:55 +0000, Laura Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am currently refreshing my perimeter mail infrastructure. > > > > The current state of affairs of DKIM signing looks pretty miserable! > > > > DKIMProxy seems to be abandonware since 2010 > > > > OpenDKIM seems to be going the way of abandonware too (last release in > > 2015 and the bug tracker filling up). > > > > I've had a quick search on github for DKIM but can't find much of > > interest. > > > > We all know what software is like, you have to keep it fed and watered > > otherwise it starts growing bugs (or worse). I'm not too keen on using > > software of 2015 vintage. > > > > What is everybody using these days ? Or have I missed something in the > > world of email and everyone's moved from DKIM to the Next Best Thing > > (TM). > > > > Looking forward to your suggestions > > > > Laura > > Hello Laura, > > I am using OpenDKIM on Debian Stretch, no issue at all. > > One explanation might be the standard has not changed since 2015, so > neither the binaries. If a major or even a minor change rise in the > standard, I am sure the binaries will be updated. > > If you check the DKIM web site, you will see most of the documentation > is old as well. http://www.dkim.org/. > > Adding new features on a software that works is also a nice way to add > more bugs ;-). Perhaps the libraries are actually working for most of > people. > > Kind regards, > André
The standard has changed. See RFC 8301 and RFC 8463. Scott K
