> On May 23, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Doug Hardie <bc...@lafn.org> wrote:
>
> It is a non-existent address and is fine. It's just surprising that one of
> the non-existent addresses gets a different log message. The only thing I
> can think of is that the originator has a non-printing character somewhere in
> the address.
No, the reason is that the address existed in the past, and
so is cached as verified. That cached value will expire at
some point, and then it will become unverified. Not clear
why you use recipient verification...
--
Viktor.
