> Date: Saturday, December 09, 2017 20:44:37 +0000 > From: Richard <lists-post...@listmail.innovate.net> > >> Date: Saturday, December 09, 2017 14:31:48 -0600 >> From: Robert Wolfe <robert.wo...@robertwolfe.org> >> >>> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Richard wrote: >>> >>> >>> > Date: Saturday, December 09, 2017 13:37:17 -0600 >>> > From: Robert Wolfe <robert.wo...@robertwolfe.org> >>> > >>> > Hi all! >>> > >>> > The organization I work for requires IPv6 compatibility in all >>> > new hardware and software we deploy. >>> > >>> > The issue is is we are having an issue with Postfix 2.1 (as >>> > shipped with REL 7.4) being apparently IPv6 compatible. Should >>> > we build this from source and use an updated release? And if >>> > so, how new of a release should we use for IPv6 compliance? >>> >>> I believe that the release of postfix that ships with RHEL7.4 is >>> likely 2.10.1, not 2.1 -- at least that is what is on centos7.4. >>> > >> But aren't 2.10 and 2.1 the same? > > No. These numbers are integers, not decimals. See: > > <http://www.postfix.org/announcements.html> > > for version history, back to 2008 / release 2.5.0, that might help > to clarify the release numbering. > > [please don't top post (or include me directly on messages, i'm on > the list).] >
to add ... according to: <http://www.postfix.org/IPV6_README.html> IPv6 support was added to postfix with 2.2, so I don't think you should have any compliance issues with the 2.10.1 release that ships with RHEL7.4.
