Or rather, AREN'T. Sorry. :) My grammar teacher would have had a time with this one :)
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Robert Wolfe <robert.wo...@robertwolfe.org> wrote: > But isn't 2.10 and 2.1 the same? > > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Richard <lists-postfix@listmail. > innovate.net> wrote: > >> >> >> > Date: Saturday, December 09, 2017 13:37:17 -0600 >> > From: Robert Wolfe <robert.wo...@robertwolfe.org> >> > >> > Hi all! >> > >> > The organization I work for requires IPv6 compatibility in all new >> > hardware and software we deploy. >> > >> > The issue is is we are having an issue with Postfix 2.1 (as shipped >> > with REL 7.4) being apparently IPv6 compatible. Should we build >> > this from source and use an updated release? And if so, how new of >> > a release should we use for IPv6 compliance? >> >> I believe that the release of postfix that ships with RHEL7.4 is >> likely 2.10.1, not 2.1 -- at least that is what is on centos7.4. >> >> >> >
