> Am 04.04.2017 um 17:22 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org>: > > >> On Apr 4, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Christian Rößner >> <c...@roessner-network-solutions.com> wrote: >> >>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = >> ... >>> ldap:ldaprfx, >> ... >> >> Maybe I am wrong, but aren't you missing a keyword here? Something like >> check_sender_access or check_recipient_access or vice versa? >> >> ... >> check_XYZ_access ldap:ldaprfx, > > The "check_recipient_access" is implied, and though such > implicit use is discouraged, this is not the OP's problem.
Yes, you are right. I did not read carefully enough. Sorry. Does the CGPro support replication? Maybe you could add a consumer to your MTA. That way, you had a fixed known base. Non existent entries would probably not result in error 32 for that fixed base DN. Just an idea. Christian -- Erlenwiese 14, 36304 Alsfeld T: +49 6631 78823400, F: +49 6631 78823409, M: +49 171 9905345
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
