On Wednesday, December 07, 2016 02:08:24 AM Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 08:47:27PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > I'm shocked that they have done such a thing. I > > > wonder if a post to their mailing list would get the attention of the > > > right person. > > > > There is almost certainly not a right person. PDNS is in the Universe > > section of their archive that's community maintained. Unfortunately, the > > non- Canonical development community in Ubuntu has almost vanished I'm a > > former member of it myself). > > I wonder why it is that multiple users are brave enough to go with > a resolver that is not a mainstream part of the O/S? Is there some > HOWTO somewhere that's encouraging them to stray away from more > mainstream options? > > Instead of partly disabling DANE support, it seems to make more > sense to switch to unbound or BIND.
I agree. I think most users don't understand the distinction between the parts of the archive. Scott K
