--On Wednesday, April 06, 2016 1:23 PM -0500 Noel Jones
<njo...@megan.vbhcs.org> wrote:
On 4/6/2016 10:52 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, April 06, 2016 6:36 PM +0200 lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com>:
Is anyone familiar with this RBL and its quality? Not a whole lot
of info at <http://bad.psky.me/about/>. Terms seem probably ok
<http://bad.psky.me/terms/>.
If there isn't a lot of info, expect the worst. You should always be
aware that you "outsource" at least parts of the ham/spam decision
and
you really should be careful about that.
Right, thus me asking if anyone has any info/experience with it. ;)
A customer enabled it in their environment and is happy with the
results so far, but I'd want more information before doing so myself
or making any type of general recommendation about it.
--Quanah
You can test this RBL in smtpd_*_restrictions by using warn_if_reject.
You can test this RBL in postscreen by using a weight of *0.
Test rejections will be logged, but will not reject mail.
Thanks Noel! Postscreen it is. :)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
A division of Synacor, Inc
