On 4/6/2016 10:52 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Wednesday, April 06, 2016 6:36 PM +0200 lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: > >> >> Zitat von Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com>: >> >>> Is anyone familiar with this RBL and its quality? Not a whole lot >>> of info at <http://bad.psky.me/about/>. Terms seem probably ok >>> <http://bad.psky.me/terms/>. >> >> If there isn't a lot of info, expect the worst. You should always be >> aware that you "outsource" at least parts of the ham/spam decision >> and >> you really should be careful about that. > > Right, thus me asking if anyone has any info/experience with it. ;) > A customer enabled it in their environment and is happy with the > results so far, but I'd want more information before doing so myself > or making any type of general recommendation about it. > > --Quanah >
You can test this RBL in smtpd_*_restrictions by using warn_if_reject. You can test this RBL in postscreen by using a weight of *0. Test rejections will be logged, but will not reject mail. -- Noel Jones
