On 12/4/15 7:08 PM, Noel Jones wrote:

> The sender domain must have either an MX or an A record.
> You can reply to a domain with only an A record.

If I send mail to the above address, there is no server that can receive it:

> telnet 78.134.2.123 25
Trying 78.134.2.123...

No response given. There is nothing there!

> Postfix has no code to distinguish sender domains with no MX only an A record,
> and not likely that feature will ever be added.
> Sender domains with neither MX nor A record -- domains you can't reply to --
> can be rejected with reject_unknown_sender_domain.

I had eject_unknown_sender_domain in smtpd_sender_restrictions, and it did not work. It is now in smtpd_client_restrictions.


The documentation says:

> reject_unknown_sender_domain:
> Reject the request when Postfix is not final destination for the sender
>    address, and the MAIL FROM domain has
>    1) no DNS A or MX record, or
> 2) a malformed MX record such as a record with a zero-length MX hostname. > The unknown_address_reject_code parameter specifies the numerical response > code for rejected requests (default: 450). The response is always 450 in > case of a temporary DNS error. The unknown_address_tempfail_action parameter > specifies the action after a temporary DNS error (default: defer_if_permit).

In this case Postfix was final destination for the sender, if I understand that
sentence correctly.


> The client mentioned is currently listed on several blacklists. Maybe the client wasn't listed > at the time you received their spam, but consider using some dnsbl's in your setup.

I would rather use local filters than remote black lists, for at least two reasons:
- they do not use DNSSEC,
- they learn about your incoming addresses.

smtp  inet  n   -   -   -   -   smtpd
    -v
verbose logging is almost always a mistake.  The important messages
get drowned in the flood of irrelevant information.

Verbose logging is not a mistake when debugging, which is what I am doing at this time.

    -o syslog_name=postfix/port-25
    -o smtpd_tls_security_level=may
    -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=no
    -o smtpd_delay_reject=no
generally unwise to disable smtpd_delay_reject, except maybe as a
$stress mitigation during an overload/attack.

I am running a sensitive site, and need it to be responsive and resilient.
Rapid rejection is necessary, albeit not sufficient.


Reply via email to