please don't top-post and don't link to external ressources
especially not ones require javascript

* output of "pstconf -n"
* "master.cf"
* directly into the mail

the whole sentence with "unders smtp and not under smtps" makes no sense

Am 29.01.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Орхан Ибад-оглы Гасымов:
Personally for me, it's an interesting situation: DSPAM works, but tags
only local mail; other mail is delivered as if there's no content filter
at all. Maybe something is wrong with my "master.cf <http://master.cf>"
file?

If anyone here used Postfix with DSPAM, please take a look at my Postfix
configs, I'm stuck in this situation and don't know what troubleshooting
steps to take further.
>
2015-01-29 11:03 GMT+04:00 Орхан Ибад-оглы Гасымов <gasymov...@vfmgiu.ru
<mailto:gasymov...@vfmgiu.ru>>:

    I read the file "postfix.txt" in shared docs of DSPAM, but I can't
    make DSPAM insert any headers into mails if I only specify it as a
    content filter under "smtp" in "master.cf <http://master.cf>", and
    not under "smtps". Probably my configuration files (with stripped
    comments) will explain everything better:

    dspam.conf: https://cloud.mail.ru/public/8eda6c0df06a/dspam.conf.txt
    master.cf <http://master.cf>:
    https://cloud.mail.ru/public/7a06ab781307/master.cf.txt
    main.cf <http://main.cf>:
    https://cloud.mail.ru/public/2dd1062220e2/main.cf.txt

    For simplicity of my first setup, I installed DSPAM on the same
    machine as Postfix, and configured it to use libhash_drv.so, not
    other DB drivers. Software versions are the latest DSPAM and Postfix
    installed on FreeBSD 10.0. I didn't change too many defaults in
    configs, but maybe I've misconfigured something so obvious that any
    experienced user will be able to point it out right away.

    Please help me to find the error, any help is highly appreciated!

    2015-01-28 23:05 GMT+04:00 Орхан Ибад-оглы Гасымов
    <gasymov...@vfmgiu.ru <mailto:gasymov...@vfmgiu.ru>>:

        "...on the dspam list are for sure more people using dspam as
        here" - probably correct.
        That's why I started conversation with a question: "Did anyone
        had this type of misconfiguration before?" If nobody on this
        list ever used DSPAM, then there's no point to bother list users
        with questions about Postfix - DSPAM interaction.

        2015-01-28 22:50 GMT+04:00 k...@rice.edu <mailto:k...@rice.edu>
        <k...@rice.edu <mailto:k...@rice.edu>>:

            On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:44:27PM +0400, Орхан Ибад-оглы
            Гасымов wrote:
             > Thanks for your reply.
            >
            > 2. "...dspam is abandonware" - thanks for an interesting piece of
            > information.
            >

            This statement is unsupported. It is not being developed
            agressively
            which seems to provoke this person.

Reply via email to