On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:45:30PM -0700, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> > You'd need to use virtual(5) aliases and transport(5), not local
> > aliases(5) and mailbox_transport to multiple recipients in one
> > delivery.
>
> Awesome, that's a very clear pointer in the right direction. I
> will work on changing my configuration to that end. Thanks for
> all your help!
Note however, that virtual(5) is not a complete equivalent for
aliases(5), in particular:
* No "owner_alias" feature. Bounces from deliveries to expanded
recipients are return to the sender, not the list-owner.
* No ":include:", "|command" or "/mailbox/file" support.
You need to pick your poison. If you want owner aliases, command
pipes, ... you need to accept single-recipient delivery. Otherwise,
virtual(5) aliases are generally better.
--
Viktor.
