Matt Holgate: > Is there any way of avoiding this? I see there is a > 'propagate_unmatched_extensions' parameter, but I'd have thought this > would have no effect as there is no extension in the original address.
No that is backwards. It propagates the extension that exists in the
original address and that is not matched by the lookup table.
original: name+...@example.com
table: n...@example.com -> foo...@example.net
result: foobar+...@example.net
Wietse
