> On 7 Oct 2013, at 19:30, Erwan David <er...@rail.eu.org> wrote:
> But it is false to say tjat a mail server without reverse surely is a spammer. But nobody was saying that. Almost no legitimate mail comes from addresses with no reverse DNS. Sure, some spammers will have reverse DNS. Which is why this is just one defence amongst many to keep the spam at bay. If you can't or won't set up reverse DNS for your outbound delivery agents, expect the rest of the world to treat you as a spammer even if you're not. Sent from a wee shiny thing with no keyboard that creates typos > On 7 Oct 2013, at 19:30, Erwan David <er...@rail.eu.org> wrote: > > Le 07/10/2013 20:24, li...@rhsoft.net a écrit : >> >> Am 07.10.2013 19:42, schrieb Erwan David: >>> Le 07/10/2013 19:38, li...@rhsoft.net a écrit : >>>> Am 07.10.2013 19:15, schrieb Erwan David: >>>>> No Google is really rejecting emails in IPv6 because of a lack of PTR... >>>> as virtually everbody else does for IPv4 >>>> why should someone handle IPv6 different? >>>> >>>> if you have no PTR do not deliver emial >>> That's a matter of policy, if you cannot afford to loose legitimate >>> email, you may. >> show me one legitimate mail server in 2013 without a PTR >> >> as server-admin you need to RTFM and anybody which is connecting >> a mailserver to the internet not having a PTR or coming with >> the lousy excuse "my ISP doe snot support" instead switch to >> a sane ISP did not RTFM and has to accept that others do not >> accept messages from him - the is no "if" and no "but" > > You may also completely stop accepting email, thus you will have no spam > at all. For me it is more important not to loose legitimate email. > You may have a different opinion. > > But it is false to say tjat a mail server without reverse surely is a > spammer.
