Am 10.05.2013 08:26, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: >> nobody expect that if he make mistakes in his DNS configs and is too >> lazy to verify what he configured that others configure their servers >> to help him > > Again you miss the point. The reason for a 4xx here is so the mail gets > queued and can simply be flushed after the DNS or other error is > corrected. Thus the message isn't needlessly returned to the sender. > Most of such errors are found and corrected pretty quickly. Using a 4xx > in this case keeps things more transparent to users, whether mine, > yours, or the guy at the remote SMTP site.
most of these errors are corrected after someone complaints and with a 4xx it takes up to 5 days until this happens a wrong configuration is a wrong configuration period >> with this attitude you would needto reject all with 4xx because >> someone could have make a mistake - this is a bad attitude in >> context of e-mail > > No, Reindl, this is called courtesy to fellow network operators. The > only bad attitude here is yours. You display it both here and on the > Dovecot list regularly. Being brash and arrogant is one thing. Most > people dislike that but tolerate it. But the constant cursing and > berating anyone who disagrees with you crosses the line. diagree is one thing but disagree on clear technical facts is another > Frankly I'm surprised that Wietse and Victor have let you get away with > this behavior for so long. I guess they're leaving it up to members to > add you to local kill files... frankly i am surprised that you not attack Wietse sometimes after he rferes to some documentation flowed by "to unsubscribe....."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
