Am 12.04.2013 02:00, schrieb LuKreme:
> Reindl Harald opined on Thursday 11-Apr-2013@17:03:50
>>
>>
>> Am 12.04.2013 00:35, schrieb LuKreme:
>>> # ldd /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd  
>>> /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd:
>>>        libmysqlclient.so.16 => /usr/local/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.16 
>>> (0x280cf000)
>>>        libz.so.3 => /lib/libz.so.3 (0x28139000)
>>>        libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x2814a000)
>>>        libssl.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x28160000)
>>>        libcrypto.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x281ad000)
>>>        libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x2830a000)
>>>        libpcre.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.0 (0x28321000)
>>>        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x28354000)
>>>        libcrypt.so.3 => /lib/libcrypt.so.3 (0x2843b000)
>>> # file /etc/postfix/virtual.db 
>>> /etc/postfix/virtual.db: Berkeley DB 1.85 (Hash, version 2, native 
>>> byte-order)
>>> So, postfix appears to be using Berkeley DB but is not linked against it?
>>
>> unlikely generated with the build from the ldd-output
> 
> I don’t understand what you mean. That is the output of my mailserver running 
> postfix 2.8

i can not imagine that this file is created by the postfix
of which you posted the ld-output because it is not linked
against it

>> libdb-5.3.so => /lib64/libdb-5.3.so (0x00007f28243c5000)
>>
>> rpm -q --file /lib64/libdb-5.3.so
>> libdb-5.3.21-3.fc18.x86_64
> 
> Well, I do have libdb.so:
> 
> # locate libdb.so
> /usr/local/lib/db42/libdb.so
> /usr/local/lib/db44/libdb.so
> /usr/local/lib/db48/libdb.so

which doe snot matter because it depends how postfix was compiled

>> libdb-5.3.so => /lib64/libdb-5.3.so (0x00007f28243c5000)
> 
> And I was expecting a line like that, only "libdb.so => 
> /usr/local/lib/db48/libdv.so", only it is not there. 
> Postfix seems to be using it anyway

postconf -m
btree (berkeley)
cidr
environ
fail
hash (berkeley)
internal
memcache
mysql

nis

pcre
proxy
regexp
socketmap
static
tcp
texthash
unix

http://www.postfix.org/DB_README.html

> though I am not sure which version of libdb corresponds to Berkeley DB 1.85. 
> I’m pretty sure it is not 4.8

the 1.85 is not the libdb version, the file command is generic

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to