Reindl Harald opined on Thursday 11-Apr-2013@17:03:50 > > > Am 12.04.2013 00:35, schrieb LuKreme: >> # ldd /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd >> /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd: >> libmysqlclient.so.16 => /usr/local/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.16 >> (0x280cf000) >> libz.so.3 => /lib/libz.so.3 (0x28139000) >> libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x2814a000) >> libssl.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x28160000) >> libcrypto.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x281ad000) >> libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x2830a000) >> libpcre.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.0 (0x28321000) >> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x28354000) >> libcrypt.so.3 => /lib/libcrypt.so.3 (0x2843b000) >> # file /etc/postfix/virtual.db >> /etc/postfix/virtual.db: Berkeley DB 1.85 (Hash, version 2, native >> byte-order) >> So, postfix appears to be using Berkeley DB but is not linked against it? > > unlikely generated with the build from the ldd-output
I don’t understand what you mean. That is the output of my mailserver running postfix 2.8 > libdb-5.3.so => /lib64/libdb-5.3.so (0x00007f28243c5000) > > rpm -q --file /lib64/libdb-5.3.so > libdb-5.3.21-3.fc18.x86_64 Well, I do have libdb.so: # locate libdb.so /usr/local/lib/db42/libdb.so /usr/local/lib/db44/libdb.so /usr/local/lib/db48/libdb.so > libdb-5.3.so => /lib64/libdb-5.3.so (0x00007f28243c5000) And I was expecting a line like that, only "libdb.so => /usr/local/lib/db48/libdv.so", only it is not there. Postfix seems to be using it anyway, though I am not sure which version of libdb corresponds to Berkeley DB 1.85. I’m pretty sure it is not 4.8. -- "@Drhorrible is not following you" Whew! that's a relief, I was sure some super villain was following me. Hope it's not Dick Cheney.
