On 3/27/2013 5:39 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > One could argue the example included in the file should > be clearer
I'm open to suggestions. As long as the doc section doesn't end up longer than the expression list. > (and it's missing the required '='). Fixed. Thanks for catching this oversight Noel. I've (over)looked that only a few hundred times. I also added text explaining it can be used as table type PCRE or REGEXP. -- Stan
