On Mar 14, 2013, at 09:56, Gerald Vogt <v...@spamcop.net> wrote: > On 13.03.2013 18:51, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> For my $0.02, I abandoned inbound masquerading a long time ago, >> who needs every email address of the form: >> >> u...@your-mother-has-big-email-addresses.example.com >> >> I masquerade sender addresses at the internal MSA so only the >> primary addresses of users leak out to the outside world, and *only* >> accept primary addresses. Inbound masquerading is a legacy of >> times long gone by. The fact that Postfix supports for this is a >> bit clunky is more of a signal about the feature than about Postfix. > > > I have set up postfix on all my servers with a null client configuration: > > mydestination = > relayhost = $mydomain > > It seems easier to me to keep the configuration on 100+ servers as > simple as possible and do all the rewriting on the central relays. Seems > to be the better approach to me. That's why I came up with this.
Solve the problem at the source; masquerade on each individual server, and avoid jumping through hoops on the central relay. Easier to maintain. Scales better, too. Cya, Jona
