On 13.03.2013 16:22, Wietse Venema wrote: > Gerald Vogt: >> On 13.03.2013 15:54, Wietse Venema wrote: >>>> 2. This still won't help to accept e-mails for users regardless of what >>>> comes after the @ and reject it if the user does not exist. >>> >>> To reject non-existent recipients, list the existing ones in >>> relay_recipient_maps. If you can't populate that table, use >> >> And how do I create a list to accept e-mails for u...@example.com and >> user@*.example.com for a known set of user names? > > In that case one should normalize the address (u...@whatever.example.com > -> u...@example.com) before consulting a table with all u...@example.com.
I thought that's what masquerading is for. http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#masquerade But unfortunately that's not done before the recipient address check. > Unfortunately, Postfix has (up to now) no way to feed the result > from one table into another table, but there is a workaround > which requires Postfix 2.7 or later: Too bad. I have a Centos 6 with postfix 2.6.6 > This is admittely a bit gross but so is the problem. What's so gross about the problem? It's basic masquerading. It just should be done before check the recipient address and not after... -Gerald
