Am 24.02.2013 12:28, schrieb Deeztek.com Support: > On 2/22/2013 4:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> Deeztek.com Support: >>> On February 22, 2013 3:40:22 PM Viktor Dukhovni >>> <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:13:27PM -0500, Deeztek.com Support wrote: >>>> >>>>>> b...@example.com smtp:[1.1.1.1] >>>>>> m...@example.com smtp:[2.2.2.2] >>>>>> example.com smtp:somewhere.else >>>>> Sorry about the top-posting. Okay this is a little bit closer. So, >>>>> I'm assuming if I use the domain in conjuction with recipients for >>>>> the same domain the transport line for the domain has to point >>>>> somewhere completely different than the recipient lines? In other >>>>> words I can't have the following? >>>>> >>>>> b...@example.com smtp:[1.1.1.1] >>>>> m...@example.com smtp:[2.2.2.2] >>>>> example.com smtp:[1.1.1.1] >>>> You can, but the bob entry is redundant. I don't recommend per-mailbox >>>> transport entries at all, it is best to stick to per-domain transport >>>> entries only, and handle per-user routing via virtual(5) alias >>>> rewriting. >> Typically this would be done with virtual aliases that send >> b...@example.com to b...@server-for-bob.example.com >> >> Wietse > I cannot seem to find any reference to the format you have suggested > above for the aliases file.
b...@example.com smtp:[1.1.1.1] should be in transport , not aliases I tried it as > > b...@exaple.com to b...@1.1.1.1-for-bob.example.com with no luck. Any > suggestions? > > Thanks > > Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Axel von der Ohe, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Joerg Heidrich
