Deeztek.com Support:
> On February 22, 2013 3:40:22 PM Viktor Dukhovni
> <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:13:27PM -0500, Deeztek.com Support wrote:
> >
> > > >b...@example.com smtp:[1.1.1.1]
> > > >m...@example.com smtp:[2.2.2.2]
> > > >example.com smtp:somewhere.else
> > >
> > > Sorry about the top-posting. Okay this is a little bit closer. So,
> > > I'm assuming if I use the domain in conjuction with recipients for
> > > the same domain the transport line for the domain has to point
> > > somewhere completely different than the recipient lines? In other
> > > words I can't have the following?
> > >
> > > b...@example.com smtp:[1.1.1.1]
> > > m...@example.com smtp:[2.2.2.2]
> > > example.com smtp:[1.1.1.1]
> >
> > You can, but the bob entry is redundant. I don't recommend per-mailbox
> > transport entries at all, it is best to stick to per-domain transport
> > entries only, and handle per-user routing via virtual(5) alias rewriting.
Typically this would be done with virtual aliases that send
b...@example.com to b...@server-for-bob.example.com
Wietse
