2012/9/20 Anonymous <nore...@breaka.net>: >>Thanks a lot everyone! After thinking long and hard about all your advice I >>finally ended up with: >> >>..+ postfix-anti-UCE.txt +.. > > "Ultimate" server, or "cheap" server? > > Postfix-anti-UCE.txt is a poor choice because of the damage it does to > legitimate mail. Although you may be stuck with it if you cannot > afford a server that can do a more intelligent analysis. But if your > resources are too tight to analyse every message, then you can't build > an "ultimate email server". > > DNSBLs are a sloppy way to cut down on traffic - a strategy large > providers use to cut expenses (read: increase profits) at the cost of > legitimate mail. > > An "ultimate" mail server that is built with quality of service in > mind does not use crude techniques prone to collateral damage. >
Thank you for your reply. It stands out from all the rest ;) What are these more intelligent, less crude techniques you talk about? Mikkel
