Am 30.07.2012 01:29, schrieb Wietse Venema: > Engin qwert: >> root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# telnet 168.100.189.2 25Trying >> 168.100.189.2...telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host > > Then your ISP is blocking your outbound SMTP connections.
as said a month ago -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: "no route to host" error message Datum: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:58:06 +0200 Von: Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> Organisation: the lounge interactive design An: postfix-users@postfix.org BOAH DO NOT SWITCH TO TOP-POSTING Am 13.07.2012 16:33, schrieb Engin qwert: > -------------- >> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:25:54 +0200 >> From: h.rei...@thelounge.net >> To: postfix-users@postfix.org >> Subject: Re: "no route to host" error message >> >> >> >> Am 13.07.2012 16:20, schrieb Engin qwert: >> > Hello and sorry for asking again. >> > >> > I telnet'ted the hotmail.com from both port 25 and port 587 when I telnet >> > directly from server or any other >> > location in Istanbul >> > ---------- >> > engin@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~$ telnet hotmail.com 25 >> > Trying 65.55.72.183... >> > Trying 65.55.72.135... >> > Trying 65.55.72.151... >> > Trying 65.55.72.167... >> > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host >> >> contact your ISP after made sure you are not >> blocking something via iptables your own >> >> this is simply a firewall-rejecting >> >> "-j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-unreachable" will exactly >> trigger this repsones regardless if it is done outgoing >> in your firewall or somewehere in the network >> ___________________ >> >> http://www.linuxtopia.org/Linux_Firewall_iptables/x4550.html >> >> The following reject types are currently valid: >> icmp-net-unreachable >> icmp-host-unreachable >> icmp-port-unreachable >> icmp-proto-unreachable >> icmp-net-prohibited >> icmp-host-prohibited. >> >> The default error message is to send a port-unreachable to the host > Sorry for asking everything but I want to make sure there isn't any > rejection. I run the command you told me. > To my weak understanding ther is no restrictions at all in the iptables isn't > it? > -------------- > root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# iptables -L -n > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) > target prot opt source destination > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) > target prot opt source destination > > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) > target prot opt source destination no, so call your ISP and scream loud in the phone
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
