On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nikolaos Milas <nmi...@noa.gr> wrote:

> On 8/3/2012 6:40 πμ, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>  What is the best / reliable site to find newer postfix rpm packages
>> for centos 5 / rhel 5? by default it ships postfix 2.3.x and it's a
>> bit antique version.
>>
>>
> Hi Eero,
>
> These are considered fine: 
> http://postfix.wl0.org/en/**available-packages/<http://postfix.wl0.org/en/available-packages/>,
> yet they diverge from standard (include VDA patch and possibly more
> non-standard options). But you can download the src.rpm and build RPMs
> yourself disabling any undesired options (see directions:
> http://postfix.wl0.org/en/**building-rpms/<http://postfix.wl0.org/en/building-rpms/>
> ).
>
> Other SRPMs I know:
> http://www.kutukupret.com/**downloads-page/<http://www.kutukupret.com/downloads-page/>
> http://www.invoca.ch/pub/**packages/postfix/RPMS/ils-5/**SRPMS/<http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/postfix/RPMS/ils-5/SRPMS/>
>
> Until now, I have not been able to find ready-made CentOS Postfix RPMs
> with standard-only options.
>
> You could also compile from source as described here:
> http://stevejenkins.com/blog/**2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-**
> on-rhel5-centos-5-from-source/<http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-on-rhel5-centos-5-from-source/>
>
> I currently use the latter methodology since a year or so on a number of
> systems and it works fine.
>
> However, if someone can point to ready-made RPMs with standard-only
> options, I would be interested as well, as building from source does not
> scale well.
>
> Note that this has been discussed again in this list. See for example:
> http://www.mailinglistarchive.**com/html/postfix-users@**
> postfix.org/2011-10/msg00094.**html<http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/postfix-users@postfix.org/2011-10/msg00094.html>
>
> Best regards,
> Nick
>


CentSLT repos http://centos.alt.ru/ has Postfix 2.9.1
http://centos.alt.ru/repository/centos/readme.txt

Regards,
Mihira.
-- 
The mysteries of the Universe are revealed when you break stuff.

Reply via email to