On Thu, Feb 23, 2012, at 04:13 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: > You are not listening.
Actually, I am. And I'm hearing contradcitions, incorrect advice, and downright snyde comments. Your presumption that message sent == message received, however, is rather flawed. > I believe some serious book-learning is in order... Which parts of my communication to the list that I'm attempting to learn & clarify more -- by adding the list's contributions to the mix of prior extensive reading & experimentation -- are evading your attention ? Perhaps I missed your memo that we have to have all the answers before daring to ask a question?
