Hi,
On Jan 13, 2012, at 5:52 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Friday 13 January 2012 16:57:21 Al Zick wrote:
On Jan 12, 2012, at 3:57 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote:
Apart from this if you use some trustable RBL, perhaps
------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^
greylisting and you update Spamassassin rules regularly...
you should be pretty fine..
I am not using spamassassin, or greylisting, and I just removed
the RBL's because of waaaaaay too many false positives.
This is absurd. It surely means you chose some overly-aggressive (not
trustable) DNSBLs. To say that all DNSBLs cause loss of mail is
ridiculous. Why didn't you even consider it worth mentioning what
lists you were using
I am not trying to start a flame war with anyone. Obviously you
understand what effective spam filtering should look like.
Here is where I am at: I had about 10 of RBLs at one time (including
some of the ones you mentioned), but I slowly removed them. What do
you do when people that you need to be in contact with everyday are
being blocked? I guess that you can use them if you don't mind having
an ever growing whitelist. Can they they be weighted somehow?
Thanks,
Al