Stan Hoeppner: > nicely. On the other hand, you won't see an EXTx filesystem capable of > anywhere close to 10GB/s or greater file IO. Here XFS doesn't break a > sweat.
I recall that XFS was optimized for fast read/write with large
files, while email files are small, and have a comparatively high
metadata overhead (updating directories, inodes etc.). XFS is
probably not optimal here.
Wietse
