-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:58:50 +0100 > Von: Lorens Kockum <postfix-users-4...@tagged.lorens.org> > An: postfix-users@postfix.org > Betreff: Re: The future of SMTP ?
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Steve wrote: > > The spamming problem is not something that you can fix by > > replacing SMTP with something new. > > An appropriate illustration is the initiative taken recently by > Germany's government to create a secure e-mail environment. It > does not replace SMTP. It mandates encryption, digital > signatures with government-issued certificates, isolation from > the current SMTP network, certified providers, and (optional?) > per-message fees. > > http://www.itworld.com/software/139104/germany-identifies-secure-way-deal-spam > De-Mail will probably cut down Spam but that is only a side effect. The main purpose of De-Mail is not about Spam. The reasons for De-Mail are others. Anyway... I am not German but I personally am not trusting De-Mail. Why should I trust a system in which the ISP is able to decrypt my message? For me encryption needs to be end to end. -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
