-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:42:55 +0100 > Von: Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> > An: postfix-users@postfix.org > Betreff: Re: The future of SMTP ?
> > > Am 13.03.2011 12:38, schrieb Steve: > > And today it is not big deal to cut down spam to less then 1% of the > inbound. > > but not only with postfix > No. Not only with postfix alone. But most of us are not only using postfix in their messaging infrastructure. > and without taking money in the hand > Money for what? Nothing is free. The hardware on which postfix runs costs money, the connectivity costs money, work time costs money, etc... But you can get a decent low inbound spam rate without paying one single cent for the anti-spam/anti-virus solution and without spending much time in implementing it. > do not tell us only with strict smtp you get 99% spam away > I don't know that. I just wrote that if you would enforce strict SMTP then you would already lower the spam inbound. I have never tried to use 100% strict SMTP. I can't do that. I am an ISP/ESP and following strictly the SMTP standard is not an option for me. I could do that but then I would loose much of my customers. > > I really don't understand why people keep telling that spam is a > problem? > > because there are peopole out their whose time costs money? > My time costs money too. As I wrote above: Nothing is free. -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
