Am 17.02.2011 08:43, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: > * Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>: > >>> so orange.stuon.com told antispam.stuon.com: 550 5.1.1 ... >>> and >>> antispam.stuon.com converted this to 450 4.1.1 ... >>> thus your postfix got a 450. >>> >>> so the problem is on antispam.stuon.com >> >> *argh* >> >> i looked only at the end of the line :-( >> so they have a poor setup > > That's a very commonplace error
are they all drunken out there? a few minutes ago i did get the bounce from our server because we are bouncing after 3 days instead of five unbelieveable.... seems my mail to their hostmaster reached someone after greylisting :-) [root@mail:~]$ cat maillog | grep stuonline.at Feb 17 00:05:53 mail postfix/smtp[6807]: EA7FCC5: to=<hostmas...@stuonline.at>, relay=antispam.stuon.com[82.96.70.21]:25, delay=0.27, delays=0.08/0/0.15/0.03, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred (host antispam.stuon.com[82.96.70.21] said: 450 4.7.1 <hostmas...@stuonline.at>: Recipient address rejected: Policy Rejection- Please try later. (in reply to RCPT TO command)) Feb 17 00:21:46 mail postfix/smtp[6997]: EA7FCC5: to=<hostmas...@stuonline.at>, relay=antispam.stuon.com[82.96.70.21]:25, delay=953, delays=942/0.02/0.06/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok, id=13195-04, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 5DD2C493C002)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
