On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:39:12 +1300, Simon <[email protected]> wrote: > We are receiving what appears to be backscatter from spam that is using a > valid address in the Return Path. I have included an example of the
job.com spam
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:39:12 +1300, Simon <[email protected]> wrote: > We are receiving what appears to be backscatter from spam that is using a > valid address in the Return Path. I have included an example of the
job.com spam