On 2/1/2011 6:39 PM, Simon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Noel Jones
<njo...@megan.vbhcs.org <mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org>> wrote:
Return-Path: <soa@*
<mailto:s...@newmedia.net.nz
<mailto:s...@newmedia.net.nz>>*[ourdomain.actual.domain]**>
Received: from 195-191-72-102.optolan.net.ua
<http://195-191-72-102.optolan.net.ua>
<http://195-191-72-102.optolan.net.ua> (unknown
[195.191.72.102])
The client 195.191.72.102 is listed in zen.spamhaus.org
<http://zen.spamhaus.org>. I would start with using
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
<http://zen.spamhaus.org> somewhere in your config.
And then add the backscatter.org <http://backscatter.org>
RBL as someone else suggested.
http://www.backscatterer.org/?target=usage (see the
postfix section)
Hmm - thats interesting: our config allready as:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org <http://zen.spamhaus.org>,
...
Do i need to setup sender restrictions as well?
[Please post in plain text. Your mail would be easier to read
without the html mangling]
Does your maillog contain examples of other hosts being
rejected by zen?
# grep 'reject:.*zen.spamhaus' /path/to/maillog
If yes, then everything is OK; likely that client simply
wasn't yet listed when the mail arrived at your server.
If you don't have any rejects from zen in your log, maybe your
config is broken, or maybe zen doesn't answer your IP due to
excessive queries.
http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/dnsblusage.html
If you need help with your config, show "postconf -n" output.
-- Noel Jones
