On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:31:21PM -0500, cmallon wrote:

> submission inet n      -       n       -       -       smtpd
>     -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject
>     -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
>     -o content_filter=dksign:[127.0.0.1]:10027

>     -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
>     -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access 
> hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_blacklist,hash:/etc/postfix/perm_blacklist,permit_mynetworks,reject

The message your reported as 'delivered' before came in on the submission
"port 587" port, as evidenced by the huge queue for dkim signing.

You have botched the master.cf entry for this, since white-space is
not allowed in "-o parameter=value" master.cf overrides. I'd expect
to see warnings in your logs to that effect.

> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>       check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_blacklist,
> 
>       Recipients in this table are handled as specified.
> 
> That's my problem -- they aren't.  All the recipient addresses in this
> table are marked "reject"

The master.cf file overrides this (incorrectly) for the submission service.

> mail2:/var/spool/postfix root# postmap -q thewhiteroom...@tiscali.co.uk
>       /etc/postfix/recipient_blacklist
> reject

That's better.

> How did this message enter your system?

I mean logs!!!

> Where the rest of the logging
> for the queue-id in question? What was the state of "main.cf" at the
> time.
> 

> Dec  9 08:58:59 mail2 postfix/qmgr[16878]: 0725C8E704FD: 
> from=<forumwatc...@myclient.com>, size=2019, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Dec  9 08:59:00 mail2 postfix/smtp[16933]: 0725C8E704FD: 
> to=<thewhiteroom...@tiscali.co.uk>, 
> relay=mxgb1.opaltelecom.net[62.24.139.61]:25, delay=14026, 
> delays=14025/0.11/0.67/0.33, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host 
> mxgb1.opaltelecom.net[62.24.139.61] said: 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected 
> thewhiteroom...@tiscali.co.uk (in reply to RCPT TO command))
> Dec  9 08:59:01 mail2 postfix/qmgr[16878]: 0725C8E704FD: removed

Useless! Where's the smtpd or pickup logging.

> I was under the impression that QSHAPE wouldn't run on MAC OS --
> but I'll give it a shot and get back to you with the results.

The qshape Perl code is reasonably portable.

-- 
        Viktor.

Reply via email to