Am 09.12.2010 08:19, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: > Stefan G. Weichinger put forth on 12/8/2010 5:55 PM: >> Am 09.12.2010 00:53, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: >> >>> * is it really making greylisting useless? I use postgrey successfully >> >> small correction: on my own servers I run policyd for greylisting, not >> postgrey ... ;) just to be correct, and maybe there are specific issues >> with policyd vs. postgrey ... > > My comments were greylisting solution agnostic. The pcre list plus > spamhaus zen is about all you need to stop most bot spam. As always, > YMMV etc. I may have omitted zen from my original post, due to the > assumption that everyone already uses zen anyway.
Oh, I somehow feel outdated ;-) I use policyd-weight for BLs, so I assume I could add that zen-BL somewhere "before" calling pol-weight, just for testing. Hacking pol-weight to use zen seems a bit dangerous to me as I don't have any clue which weight(s) to assign ... I will read this maybe: http://www.mail-archive.com/policyd-weight-l...@ek-muc.de/msg00463.html - Aside from that: The impact of using that pcre-list should be visible by counting less greylisted mail since activating it, correct? # grep "Dec 9" /var/log/mail | grep "Policy Reject" | wc -l or so ;-) Thanks, S
