Per Jessen wrote:

> This produces an ndr, which is also rejected due to lack of authentication, 
> as '<>' doesn't seem to be found in smtp_sasl_password_maps.

Extract from a test with debug enabled:  (suitably snipped & obscured)

Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/qmgr[16294]: A77FE33266: from=<>, size=2813, 
nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: < 
outbound.example.com[127.0.0.1]:25: 220 outbound.example.com ESMTP Postfix 
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: > 
outbound.example.com[127.0.0.1]:25: EHLO mail.example1.com
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: < 
outbound.example.com[127.0.0.1]:25: 250-outbound.example.com
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: < 
outbound.example.com[127.0.0.1]:25: 250-STARTTLS
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: < 
outbound.example.com[127.0.0.1]:25: 250-AUTH DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: < 
outbound.example.com[127.0.0.1]:25: 250-AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: < 
outbound.example.com[127.0.0.1]:25: 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: < 
outbound.example.com[127.0.0.1]:25: 250-8BITMIME
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: < 
outbound.example.com[127.0.0.1]:25: 250 DSN
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: server features: 0x903f size 0
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: Using ESMTP PIPELINING, TCP send 
buffer size is 4096
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: maps_find: smtp_sasl_passwd: 
outbound.example.com: not found
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: maps_find: smtp_sasl_passwd: 
outbound.example.com: not found
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: smtp_sasl_passwd_lookup: no auth 
info found (sender=`', host=`outbound.example.com')
Dec  9 10:40:56 neon postfixo/smtp[16320]: > 
outbound.example.com[127.0.0.1]:25: MAIL FROM:<> SIZE=2813


I guess this is intended behaviour - there is no sender address,
so the destination hostname is looked up instead, but shouldn't there 
also be a lookup with sender='<>' ?


/Per Jessen, Zürich

Reply via email to