On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:28:42 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 22:15 -0400, John Peach wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:00 +1000 > > Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several > > > > years and are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer > > > > free delist for them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is complete FUD, yes, I know what their website says, but > > > knowing the people behind them I can assure you it has never been > > > demanded, it is a deterrent, a request to their ticketing system > > > is all it takes to get out, please don't fall for the mistruths > > > by those who have been in SORBS, infact, better to ask yourself > > > why they were in there in the first place. > > > > > > > ... because we have so-called educated professionals who fall for > > phishing scams on a regular basis, despite regular warnings about > > the same. > > > > Right, so, how is THAT a false positive, it is a justifiable listing > if they became part of the problem. > I never said it was a false positive. Just that it's a waste of time trying to get delisted; we gave up with that years ago. -- John
