On 19 Dec 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Anthony Campbell:
> > On 19 Dec 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > 
> > > Perhaps your shell's "test" built-in command is broken on the system in
> > > question. Add "set -x" just above the test, to see what command is
> > > actually executed.
> > > 
> > >     add-> set -x
> > >           test -r ...
> > >     add-> set +x
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > 
> > Yes, it was the version in /usr/lib/postfix. I tried the above, which
> > produced a lot of lines of output, but I have no real idea what they
> > mean.
> 
> You don't have to. This output helps *US* to figure out what is going
> on.
> 
>       Wietse

I'll look into the possibilities you listed in your previous post.
Meanwhile, I attach the output of the above "set -x" modifications>

Anthony


-- 
Anthony Campbell - a...@acampbell.org.uk 
Microsoft-free zone - Using Debian GNU/Linux 
http://www.acampbell.org.uk - sample my ebooks at
http://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/acampbell

Attachment: postfixerror.gz
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to