06.11.09, 02:32, "Victor Duchovni" <victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com>:
> > That's why I use postfix and that's why I can't use pre-queued > > filter. I thought about different scheme, but postfix is the "easy way", > > so I'm trying speedup things a bit :) > You are not going to succeed without more spindles and likely more CPUs. > Just launching a "Perl" hello-world script takes >10ms on a fast machine, > do that 100 times a second and you've burned a CPU, and non-trivial > scripts are slower still. As I said above - scripts is not the point at a time. If it will, I'll rewrite them, so my scripts will listen unix socket and I'll put messages directly into sockets. I think, that things will go faster, if postfix, instead of saving new messages to queue, will try to deliver it to deliver agent "in memory", and only if that fails, save the message to queue. Don't you think, this will be faster? Is that possible? I can make a patch (not for upstream, only for me).
